安全警示不应成为华人参与政治的障碍

新西兰安全情报局(NZSIS)最新报告提醒,外国势力正在持续尝试接触和影响新西兰政治人物,尤其是在大选前夕,这一警示值得所有政党、候选人和选民认真对待。但与此同时,我们也必须准确区分正常的政治参与、合法的社区互动与真正的外国干预。

候选人在竞选期间接触不同社区,是民主政治最基本的组成部分。华人社区同样有权向候选人表达关切、提出政策诉求、参加公开会议、邀请候选人交流,以及通过合法、透明的方式参与选举活动。仅仅因为一次活动有华人参加,或者候选人与华人社团、企业及社区人士接触,就把这种正常互动定义为“外国干涉”,显然是不恰当的。

事实上,NZSIS自己的表述也强调,透明地建立政治影响力本身可以是合法的。真正值得警惕的是隐藏资金来源、接受外国政府指令、利益交换、欺骗、胁迫,以及试图秘密操纵政治人物立场等行为。

因此,这份报告不应该让新西兰华人产生“少参与政治、少接触候选人才能避免被怀疑”的错误认识。恰恰相反,华人更应该积极参与新西兰民主进程。

投票、参加候选人会议、向议员和候选人提出问题、参与地方社区活动、加入政党、关注公共政策,都是正常的新西兰公民和居民政治生活的一部分。华人社区也应该更加主动地把自己关心的住房、教育、经济、移民、治安、养老以及国际关系等议题带入主流政治讨论。

与此同时,华人社区也应当更加重视透明度。无论是社区组织、候选人还是个人,在涉及政治活动、捐款、赞助和公共事务时,都应该遵守新西兰法律和选举规则,清楚说明资金和利益关系。

一个成熟的民主社会,既需要防范外国干预,也需要保护正常的政治交流。

不能因为担心外国干预,就让华人社区远离政治;也不能以“社区交流”为名,掩盖真正的外国干涉。

对新西兰华人而言,最好的回应不是沉默和退缩,而是更加公开、透明、合法和积极地参与新西兰民主生活。

参与政治不是外国干涉;秘密操纵政治才是。

这条界线越清楚,华人社区在新西兰社会中的声音就越有力量,也越能够证明:华人是新西兰民主社会积极而正常的一部分。

Security Warnings Should Not Discourage Chinese New Zealanders from Taking Part in Democracy

New Zealand’s Security Intelligence Service (NZSIS) has warned that foreign states are continuing to seek opportunities to influence New Zealand politicians, particularly as the country approaches a general election. This is a serious issue that deserves the attention of political parties, candidates and voters alike.

At the same time, however, it is important to distinguish between legitimate political engagement, ordinary community interaction and genuine foreign interference.

During an election campaign, candidates are expected to engage with a wide range of communities. Chinese New Zealanders have exactly the same right as everyone else to raise concerns with candidates, discuss policy, attend public meetings, invite politicians to community events and participate openly and lawfully in political activities.

Simply because a candidate meets Chinese New Zealanders, attends a Chinese community event, or speaks with Chinese community organisations or businesses does not, in itself, constitute foreign interference.

Indeed, NZSIS itself makes an important distinction: building political influence can be entirely legitimate when it is done transparently. The real concern arises when there is concealed funding, direction from a foreign government, improper exchanges of benefits, deception, coercion, or attempts to secretly manipulate a politician’s position.

The latest report should therefore not lead Chinese New Zealanders to withdraw from politics or avoid engaging with candidates for fear of being labelled as a foreign influence. Quite the opposite: Chinese New Zealanders should be encouraged to participate more actively in New Zealand’s democratic process.

Voting, attending candidate meetings, putting questions to MPs and candidates, taking part in local community activities, joining political parties and engaging with public policy are all normal parts of democratic life.

The Chinese community should also be more confident in bringing issues that matter to it — including housing, education, the economy, immigration, public safety, retirement and New Zealand’s international relationships — into the mainstream political debate.

At the same time, greater participation should go hand in hand with greater transparency. Community organisations, candidates and individuals involved in political activities, donations or sponsorship should comply with New Zealand law and electoral rules, and be open about relevant sources of funding and interests.

A mature democracy needs both strong safeguards against foreign interference and the protection of legitimate political engagement.

We should not allow concerns about foreign interference to push Chinese New Zealanders away from politics. Equally, legitimate community engagement should never be used as a cover for genuine foreign interference.

For Chinese New Zealanders, the best response is therefore not silence or retreat, but more open, transparent, lawful and active participation in New Zealand’s democratic life.

Taking part in politics is not foreign interference. Secretly manipulating politics is.

The clearer we keep that distinction, the stronger the voice of the Chinese community will be — and the more clearly we can demonstrate that Chinese New Zealanders are an active, legitimate and valued part of New Zealand’s democratic society.